design
I've seen the film objectified. highly recommended, even for observers.
many designers put into words what it means to be a designer.
I noticed that I design from the apple-automatically regarded as a good gesign, because in our world today is designed pretty much everything.
it is probably good and bad design and the design of apple feels good.
this film has made me one thing clear. design is not only look but also handling, use, use and disposal.
I've probably seen too superficial, for it is indeed the case that Apple products are designed by, from beginning to end, what one notices first of intensive use.
fact it is so with me that the fascination of the designs keep with me for a long time. I'm still thrilled with my iphone and my mac and after more than three years. No other product has ever been as long as I tied in very different ways.
johnny ive of apple in my opinion it has taken quite well: design must feel so and look like that you think, "Of course, the object x look like otherwise?"
the simple, elegant is what I design at Apple so much. It starts with the airport express, iphone is over, on the mac to the headphones.
right now is another discussion going on about the "iPhone killer" droid from motorola. I had a look at the hardware configuration times. that's not my opinion nothing special.
but I believe that the hardware is exactly the big problem or just watch the people.
I think that many people just do not understand that an iphone for example in the user's like a mac. ie as easy and accessible as a mac. I believe that only the surface is considered and not the entire concept.
I also assume that it is precisely for this reason, long time no type "iPhone killer".
captures the screen at the touch to already. I had a samsung omnia, lg screen with a current and a current htc touch screen with touch in the hand. alone is the touch screen of the "competitive" is complete crap.
you have to press the finger right on it. My personal feeling was uncomfortable with the equipment. the iphone you have to touch the screen and he just responded, do not press you have to.
I am apparently the only one the notice that. this is strange, because I was not the only one.
also would be happy if it creates a company, an equally sophisticated devices like the iPhone to invent and bring to the market, competition is good because we all know the business.
apple will under no circumstances rest on our laurels and watch what the tinkering competitive.
that is simply that the iPhone is even better and more horny, is as it already is.
had been briefly mentioned in that Verizon was more painful than with their advertising campaign. it's not cool to just count on what device can not go on it and bash, even if no device on the market that the focused device (the iPhone is here carved on it) that's enough water. advertising company
epic fail epic fail at verizon and at the one that has produced the spot.
this raises questions on verizon? a carrier? what do they actually do? why a carrier for the iPhone skin on it, if he himself produces no phones?
world ugly, old.
0 comments:
Post a Comment